justicedonedirtcheap@gmail.com



 




Representations of the Lady of Justice in the Western tradition occur in many places and at many times. She sometimes wears a blindfold, more so in Europe, but more often she appears without one. She usually carries a sword and scales. Almost always draped in flowing robes, mature but not old, no longer commonly known as Themis, she symbolizes the fair and equal administration of the law, without corruption, avarice, prejudice, or favor.


CLICK ON HEREIN BELOW PROVIDED: LAW SCHOOL BOOK IMAGES, SIMPLY SELECT THE SUBJECT OF YOUR INTEREST AND ENTER OUR HUMBLE LAW LIBRARY; THIS IS A CHRONOLOGICAL ARRANGEMENT OF OUR MERITORIOUSLY RESEARCHED TORT LAW (TO REDRESS A WRONG DONE) THEN LISTED A DETAILED ACCOUNT OF THE PRACTICAL EXPERIENCES OF OUR CONTRIBUTING SELF REPRESENTED LITIGANT'S, CONCERNING:
the study, theory and practice of litigation
as it relates to The Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick, Provincial Court and The Court of Appeal of New Brunswick; Filing, and Procedure, in general.















       Please find - here below - this Link: My Brief Story - Introduction: Welcome, this is a 'Justice' Blog intended to benefit all;   'Self Represented Litigants'.


=================================================================================================

2013 New Year's Resolution:
To however, cause the Judiciary of New Brunswick to uphold the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Reason being, that, the Charter is applicable in New Brunswick, just as all provinces are bound by the Constitution.
Despite the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was adopted in 1982, it was not until 1985, that, the main provisions regarding equality rights (section 15) came into effect. The delay was meant to give the federal and provincial governments an opportunity to review per-existing statutes and strike potentially unconstitutional inequalities.

=================================================================================================

NOTICE: above provided image is a link to the 'RANT' area of contributing Self Represented Litigants
========================================
=========================================================


Welcome, this is a 'Justice' Blog intended to benefit all;

'Self Represented Litigants'. follow this link to New Brunswick Legal Procedure 101

NOTICE: above provided image is a link to the 'Public Forum regarding our legal and judicial system


NOTICE: above provided image is a link to the 'RANT' area of contributing Self Represented Litigants

Back to Justice Done Dirt Cheap Front Page

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

I demand Proof of Claim that I must perform




I demand 'PROOF of CLAIM' that I must perform.


1.         I André Murray verily believe that no agent for  have  provided proof of claim that the alleged claims apply to the myself André Murray, nor that myself André Murray am obligated to accept the benefits offered.

2.         I André Murray verily believe THE CITY OF FREDERICTON has failed to provide proof of claim to myself, therefore there is no dispute between the parties, simply put, an offer was made and an offer was in good faith conditionally accepted, there the matter stands.

3.         I André Murray verily believe, since THE CITY OF FREDERICTON has failed to substantiate their claims against the André Murray through negotiation and discussion, further, there since it is a fact there lacks an injured party, THE CITY OF FREDERICTON has no locus standi in this matter before the Court.

4.         I André Murray verily believe, that jurisprudence has established, that a Provincial Court has no jurisdiction unless jurisdiction can be proven to exist, as opposed to a superior Court, where jurisprudence has established that jurisdiction is assumed to exist unless the contrary is shown.

5.         The Provincial Court of New Brunswick is a court of special, limited, or statutory jurisdiction, whose record must show the existence of jurisdiction in any given case to give its ruling presumptive validity.

6.         I André Murray verily believe, that if there is not dispute between Parties, the Court lacks a lis inter partes to judge, therefore the Court has no jurisdiction to act.

7.         I Andre Murray am an adult man;

8.         I Andre Murray claim common law jurisdiction;

9.         I Andre Murray do not consent and I waive all the benefits;

10.       I Andre Murray do not consent to the Court making any legal determinations against me;

11.       I Andre Murray do not consent to represent the person known as the defendant, be associated by joinder, or accept liabilities for same;

12.       I Andre Murray do not consent the Court’s jurisdictional claims against me;

13.       I Andre Murray do not consent to the Court contracting with the me;

14.       I Andre Murray do not and did not consent to the Courts Jurisdiction;

15.       I Andre Murray do not and did not consent to abide by The City of Fredericton Bylaws;

16.       I Andre Murray do not and did not consent to attorn to the jurisdiction of any Court;

17.       I Andre Murray do not and did not consent to any Court hearing  bylaw  matters any further than considering the jurisdictional issues herein presented;

Conclusion
I André Murray verily believe The Provincial Court of New Brunswick lacks:
           personal jurisdiction of the Court over the Defendant;
           Subject matter Jurisdiction and;
           jurisdiction over the particular case.

No comments: